Handbook of Ionization Spectra
CONTENT
PREFACE
 
1. PHYSICAL ASPECTS OF IONIZATION SPECTROSCOPY TECHNIQUE
1.1. The nature of ionization spectra
1.2. The role of elastic scattering in ionization spectrum formation for reflection geometry
1.3. Inelastic electron scattering
1.4. IL contour
1.5. Fine structure of ionization spectrum
1.6. Ionization losses
1.7. Opportunities of ionization spectroscopy
 
2. IONIZATION SPECTROSCOPY EQUIPMENT
2.1. Electron spectrometer
2.2. Electron gun
 
3. IL DETECTION
3.1. Detection specifics
3.2. Acceleration voltage fluctuations
3.3. Auger lines suppression
 
4. ADJUSTMENT OF SPECTROMETER'S ELECTRON OPTICS
 
5. SPECTROMETER CALIBRATION
5.1. The goal of calibration
5.2. Calibration of kinetic energy scale
5.3. Electron energy loss scale
5.4. Inspection of spectrometer’s adjustment and calibration
 
6. INTENSITY OF IONIZATION LINES
6.1. IL intensity
6.2. Primary electron energy selection
 
7. SURFACE ANALYSIS BY MEANS OF IS
7.1. Qualitative composition analysis technique
7.2. Standard samples technique
7.3. Elemental sensitivity coefficients technique
7.4. Analysis depth
7.5. Investigation of chemical bonding between the atoms
 
References
Ionisation Spectroscopy: Physical Background and Usage (Contents) On-line Library of IS spectra Info System Software and Library   About Authors

5. SPECTROMETER CALIBRATION

5.3. Electron energy loss scale

Referencing IL position to the kinetic energy scale is inconvenient because its results depend on the selected value of Ep (1.1.2). It is therefore neccessary to measure the difference Ep - E=deltaE instead of E, i.e. the distance between the EBE and IL lines. The electron energy loss scale serves this purpose. The loss scale reference point (deltaE=0) coincides with the EBE line (E=Ep), and the directions of E and scales are opposite. In the process of determination the Ep and E values, it is neccessary to take into account the difference in line's extremum location for various representations (Fig.).



  • 1 - secondary electron energy distribution in the vicinity of IL for integral representations (N(E));
  • 2 - the same in the differential representation (â dN(E)/dE);
  • 3 - the same in the second derivative representation ().
  • The relative value of the difference (shift) depends on the modulation magnitude . If is optimal, and the line is close to the Gauss shape, than the shift is equal to half the EBE line width. In this case the value of deltaE, measured in the nondifferentiated (twice differentiated) spectrum and the differentiated one can vary by 0.5..1 eV. This additional error is close to the main error of energy scale calibration and in some cases (see note) it is helpful to measure deltaE in the mode, which doesn't give such a difference.

    Taking the zero point of first derivative as the line's position allows to find the true value of deltaE, but this method is less convenient.


    Look further: 5.4. Inspection of spectrometer's adjustment and calibration

    "Handbook of Ionization Spectra"
    ISBN 966-02-1954-7
    © T. Afanasieva, I. Koval,V. Lysenko, P. Mel'nik, N. Nakhodkin, M. Pyatnitsky
    Ukrainian National Academy of Science, Ukrainian Ministry of Education and Science
    Taras Schevchenko University, Radiophysical department
    tel.: +38(044)526-05-60
    e-mail: afanasieva@univ.kiev.ua